ARTICLE UPDATE - Neural and Behavioral Evidence for Affective Priming from Unconsciously Perceived Emotional Facial Expressions and the Influence of T

Li W, Zinbarg RE, Boehm SG, Paller KA.

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, in press

Abstract Affective judgments can often be influenced by emotional information people unconsciously perceive, but the neural mechanisms responsible for these effects and how they are modulated by individual differences in sensitivity to threat are unclear. Here we studied subliminal affective priming by recording brain potentials to surprise faces preceded by 30-msec happy or fearful prime faces. Participants showed valence-consistent changes in affective ratings of surprise faces, although they reported no knowledge of prime-face expressions, nor could they discriminate between prime-face expressions in a forced-choice test. In conjunction with the priming effect on affective evaluation, larger occipital P1 potentials at 145-175 msec were found with fearful than with happy primes, and source analyses implicated the bilateral extrastriate cortex in this effect. Later brain potentials at 300-400 msec were enhanced with happy versus fearful primes, which may reflect differential attentional orienting. Personality testing for sensitivity to threat, especially social threat, was also used to evaluate individual differences potentially relevant to subliminal affective priming. Indeed, participants with high trait anxiety demonstrated stronger affective priming and greater P1 differences than did those with low trait anxiety, and these effects were driven by fearful primes. Results thus suggest that unconsciously perceived affective information influences social judgments by altering very early perceptual analyses, and that this influence is accentuated to the extent that people are oversensitive to threat. In this way, perception may be subject to a variety of influences that govern social preferences in the absence of concomitant awareness of such influences.

ARTICLE UPDATE - Differential electrocortical responses to increasing intensities of fearful and happy emotional expressions.

Leppänen JM, Kauppinen P, Peltola MJ, Hietanen JK.

Brain Research, in press

Previous studies have shown differential event-related potentials (ERPs) to fearful and happy/neutral facial expressions. To investigate whether the brain systems underlying these ERP differences are sensitive to the intensity of fear and happiness, behavioral recognition accuracy and reaction times as well as ERPs were measured while observers categorized low-intensity (50%), prototypical (100%), and caricatured (150%) fearful and happy facial expressions. The speed and accuracy of emotion categorization improved with increasing levels of expression intensity, and 100% and 150% expressions were consistently classified as expressions of the intended emotions. Comparison of ERPs to 100% and 150% expressions revealed a differential pattern of ERPs to 100% and 150% fear expressions over occipital-temporal electrodes 190-290 ms post-stimulus (a negative shift in ERP activity for high-intensity fearful expressions). Similar ERP differences were not observed for 100% and 150% happy expressions, ruling out the possibility that the ERPs to high-intensity fear reflected a response to increased expression intensity per se. Together, these results suggest that differential electrocortical responses to fearful facial expressions over posterior electrodes are generated by a neural system that responds to the intensity of negative but not positive emotional expressions.

ARTICLE UPDATE - The voice of emotion: an FMRI study of neural responses to angry and happy vocal expressions.

Johnstone T, van Reekum CM, Oakes TR, Davidson RJ.

Social Cognitive Affective Neuroscience, 1, 242-249

The human voice is one of the principal conveyers of social and affective communication. Yet relatively little is known about the neural circuitry that supports the recognition of different vocally expressed emotions. We conducted an FMRI study to examine the brain responses to vocal expressions of anger and happiness, and to test whether specific brain regions showed preferential engagement in the processing of one emotion over the other. We also tested the extent to which simultaneously presented facial expressions of the same or different emotions would enhance brain responss, and to what degree such responses depend on attention towards the vocal expression. Forty healthy individuals were scanned while listening to vocal expressions of anger or happiness, while at the same time watching congruent or discrepant facial expressions. Happy voices elicited significantly more activation than angry voices in right anterior and posterior middle temporal gyrus (MTG), left posterior MTG and right inferior frontal gyrus. Furthermore, for the left MTG region, happy voices were related to higher activation only when paired with happy faces. Activation in the left insula, left amygdala and hippocampus, and rostral anterior cingulate cortex showed an effect of selectively attending to the vocal stimuli. Our results identify a network of regions implicated in the processing of vocal emotion, and suggest a particularly salient role for vocal expressions of happiness.